TACTICAL JOB HOPPING IN REMOTE WORK

By Stephanie Diana Eubank

I don’t know about you, but when I was making my first resume in high school, the constant adage was that you shouldn’t look like you are job hopping.  You need to stay at a company for as long as you can. It looks good on a resume. However, this has not been the case for many decades now.  Especially not in the remote work community pre and post-COVID.

According to the Bureau of Labor and Statistics, as of 2022, the average employee stays in the same role for 4.1 years but only stays at the same employer for an average of 3 years. So far, the data matches the average onsite worker as well.  

As remote work is only 2020 becomes more of a norm than the 5.7% before COVID, remote workers jumped to 17.9% of all US workers in the US labor market per the Bureau of Labor and statistics as of 2020.  However, as of May 2022, 35.4% work remotely.

For clarification, let’s define what tactical job-hopping means.  Tactical job hopping refers to leaving one job or company to go to another within a 1–4-year time frame.  This is done to either shift careers because of changes to the industry or personal changes or to gain a higher title or higher pay.  When discussing tactical job hopping, the concepts that are outside of an employee’s control, like industry-wide layoffs (like that constantly happens in the financial industry to the point it is almost suspicious if you have been at the same company more than four years) or jobs that have outsourced industry-wide or have faded out due to automation.

Now those semantics are out of the way, let’s address another reason people use tactical job hopping that they won’t say in an interview.  Tactical Job Hopping to escape a toxic work environment. This reason is especially true for remote workers. There is an adage that people don’t quit jobs. They quit managers.  Well, this can also be the case for tactical job hopping.

Also, it is possible to create a toxic work environment in a remote workplace.  Unfortunately, it is an easier task in a remote workplace than one might want to think about.  The ease of developing a toxic remote workplace environment is often due to managers not being taught to manage and not being instructed on how to manage a remote workplace.  Remote work takes a different kind of management style.  As I have researched and published before, remote leadership must lead with empathy and true authenticity and communicate more inclusively and creatively. Where remote work has room to build healthy leadership boundaries, it takes more effort to show respect and openness to employees as a leader in remote work.

When leadership is toxic tactical job hopping allows onsite and remote workers to find an organizational culture that addresses these issues.  Being able to leave a toxic work situation is liberating and allows employees to prioritize their mental health and prevent burnout.  When employees prevent burnout through things like quiet quitting (establishing healthy boundaries) and acting on their wage (prioritizing work and life balance for better mental health without hurting the chain of command or leaving themselves open to being pigeonholed into one job or career field) burn out is prevented and helps to not just better productivity in an organization but also helps keep a stable economy moving by having a stable workforce.

This helps break the toxic work culture concept of staying for the sake of a resume duration to show a new company.  When tactical job hopping is considered by an employer, we prevent burnout and embrace new hires that are talented and emotionally mature. Tactical job hopping to not stay at a toxic workplace by not following the old construct of staying in the same company until they are done with you helps break the toxic work culture by breaking the cycle and not staying at a company longer than one should. Staying in a toxic workplace too long can cause workplace PTSD and this can take years of working in a nontoxic work environment and therapy to lessen the stress of workplace PTSD.

Which begs the question of Organizational Leadership, what can be done to prevent this in an onsite and remote workplace?

  1. Have Human Resources (HR) learn to spot signs of poor leadership and not just regard it as people leaving for better pay or benefits.  Investigate high turnover. 
  2. Invest in training managers on how to manage.  Don’t just assume if they are good at their job, they can lead your team.
  3. Train your managers on how to manage a remote workplace.  Remote leadership is a different ball game altogether.
    1. If you are having trouble knowing where to start developing remote leadership training check out my new consulting firm wickedbofthewestremoteconsulting.com
  4. Also, hiring leaders who are not typically those you think about for leadership in remote workplaces is another good idea. People who are better with interpersonal communication.  To learn more about what types of leadership work best in a remote workplace, check out my consulting firm’s website and social media. wickedbofthewestremoteconsulting.com

There are also some good books on these topics to help spot tactical job hopping from a toxic employee or those hurt by the economy.

Remember that sharing is caring, and if you enjoyed this article, please see my social media links and share.

Youtube: https://www.youtube.com/@Wickedbofthewest

Website: wickedbofthewestremoteconsulting.com

Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/WickedBoftheWestBusinessConsulting

Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/wickedbofthewestconsulting/

Twitter: @SDEubank

References

Bureau of Labor and Statistics. (2022, September 22). Employee Tenure Summary. Bureau of Labor and Statistics. Retrieved November 29, 2022, from https://www.bls.gov/news.release/tenure.nr0.htm.

Bureau of Labor and Statistics. (2022, May 11). 7.7 percent of workers teleworked due to COVID-19 in April 2022. Bureau of Labor and Statistics. Retrieved November 29, 2022, from https://www.bls.gov/opub/ted/2022/7-7-percent-of-workers-teleworked-due-to-covid-19-in-april-2022.htm.

Liu, J. (2022, January 18). 4 shows a company is invested in remote work long-term. CNBC. Retrieved November 29, 2022, from https://www.cnbc.com/2022/01/18/how-to-know-if-a-company-is-really-committed-to-remote-work-long-term.html

McMenamin, L. (2021, April 19). Why long-term workplace trauma is a real phenomenon. BBC Worklife. Retrieved October 20, 2022, from https://www.bbc.com/worklife/article/20210415-why-long-term-workplace-trauma-is-a-real-phenomenon

Robinson, B. (2022, October 12). Experts say that remote work is here to stay and will increase into 2023. Forbes. Retrieved November 29, 2022, from https://www.forbes.com/sites/bryanrobinson/2022/02/01/remote-work-is-here-to-stay-and-will-increase-into-2023-experts-say/

Why Isn’t Remote Work Being Pushed as An Infrastructure Recovery Initiatives Post COVID-19?

By: Stephanie Diana Eubank

Not to get too political, but there is so much political discussion right now on how to recover nationally from the economic devastation of Covid-19.  This debate is being held politically by those who are not businesspeople or people who have advanced academic experience in economics and business.  As shown in the article from Forbes, https://www.forbes.com/sites/michaeltnietzel/2021/01/08/the-college-profile-of-the-new-members-in-the-117th-congress/?sh=12f8eb233b10 of the newly elected many have advanced degrees not all are in business, and a majority of the degrees are in law, a few MBA’s, Theology and, geology.  There are also several representatives with certificates or never finished an undergrad or associate degree. 

So, as a businessperson, who has the advanced academic degrees and is working on my dissertation for my Doctorate in Business Administration I would like to weigh in on how my focus topic of remote work could be a helpful method to help our country recover economically from Covid-19.  Since remote work has so many benefits to the economy and the workforce in general this article will just focus on women and caregiving.  I will make a whole series of articles on each benefit to a governmental push for more remote work as infrastructure. 

If more benefits were given to businesses to push for employees to work remotely long term for the foreseeable future this would help business, the economy, diversity, women, issues of child and family care, and additional financial assistance to the work force as a whole.   All the way around remote work helps workers balance their lives and career goals.  One thing I am looking forward to as a remote worker is as my state opens up getting to take breaks and taking a walk to have a cup of coffee and brunch at my favorite mom and pop shops with my friends when they take their breaks.  Which still allows me time to come home finish the bulk of my work and welcome my kids back home from school.  Once I put my boys to bed, I can work on my homework and get to bed and start the day again. 

I have had this ability to balance my work, school and, family luckily for the past seven years.  Oh, and trust me I understand that I have been fortunate to have the ability to work remote and continue to work remote.  Honestly, I don’t know how I would have been able to provide and care for my boys regardless of their disabilities if I was not lucky enough to have the opportunity to work remotely.  

However, I do understand based on experience over the past seven years and now as the country is opening back up (even though there is concern of another wave of COVID and its variants) management pushes back against remote work.  (This is mostly because remote work causes managers to have to develop empathy and lead authentically not using the term as an excuse to emotionally abuse employees by being a jerk.  See my previous article on that topic.) Yet, if government makes a push to help both large and small companies push for remote work where it can be done it may be the push needed to really recover.  

The statistics are compelling on how remote can help our economy.  Especially for women.  First off in the US the concept of a full-time mom is not normative anymore due to economical constraints.  Speaking from example of being both the child growing up in a dule income home and being the mother of a dual income home, it is few and far between that families can afford to be a one income household. Even though my life, family, and my husband’s work are here in Silicon Valley California.  Which also happens to be one of the most expensive places in the country to live.  It also doesn’t help that traffic is so bad here as well but, that’s a different article to write.  There is little ability to have a single income family to have the bandwidth to be a full-time mom not just here but nationally.  The Population Reference Bureau as seen in the article, https://www.prb.org/resources/traditional-families-account-for-only-7-percent-of-u-s-households/ found in 2003 only 7% of American’s we able to live in a one income household with children. Where dual income with children at the time was 16% of the US and dual income without children was at 13%.  The other 64% were single parents and single people.  And according to The Hill article https://thehill.com/opinion/finance/543941-americas-single-parent-families 30% of American Families are single parents usually moms with a child under 18.  Of that 30% of single parent families 75% are single moms.  The article goes on to break down the socio-economical statistics of single moms but, it points out the face 51% of the single parents in the US are fellow minorities.  Specifically, Hispanic, and African American families are the most effected.  Single moms tend to also make less and have less work opportunities regardless of education, experience, and skills (again a soap box for a different day).  What is heart breaking single moms are 34% more likely to be impoverished.  

The article also mentions that 57% of American’s scapegoat single parents, single moms especially and comment on them working too much and not being enough for their kids or not working hard enough.  (again another soap box as I have been a single mom, a working mom, and a student mom all at the same time and remote helped me do it all and teach my boys hard work ethic and how it pays off.  In an area that to be middle class for a family of three the income required is $150k for a single income so we were poor for our area.  I also like to think it taught my boys that I love them so much that I work tirelessly to make sure they have every advantage I can possibly provide.)

Women are also statistically the main demographic as a caregiver for family members who are disabled or elderly.  Which largely is unpaid!  According to the statistics on the Family Caregiver Alliance https://www.caregiver.org/resource/caregiver-statistics-demographics/ their data was collected by AARP and found 34.2 Million Americans provide unpaid care as of 2015,  16.6% are adults caring for disabled children and 34.2 Million of these caregivers are caring for someone 50+ years of age again unpaid.  I have had several friends who while caring for family members who were ill or disabled would not have been able to care for them on their own if they didn’t work from home.  Of those friends fortunately they worked from home, so their family members did not die alone.  These friends were both men and women with varying ethnicities and socio-economical backgrounds.  Though per the same article AARP found that 75% of unpaid caregivers are women.

There is also the remote team pitfall of many companies pre- Covid-19 would create what are called “dream teams” which are teams made up of experts in their field.  This is done without regard for team design of personalities or on how well each person works together in a cohesive team.  

This design flaw can be used to the advantage of women in the economy.  Per the PEWs research https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2019/06/20/u-s-women-near-milestone-in-the-college-educated-labor-force/ women make up a little over 50% of the college educated work force and 46% of the over all workforce is women with higher education.  Also, the PEWs research showed that of all the undergraduate degrees earned in the US 57% were awarded to women.  This means the push for advantages of remote work would bring highly educated women opportunities to balance the caregiving role that societally tends to be thrust onto women more than men.

The benefits of the government viewing remote work as an infrastructure cause will help the economy and work force from the bottom up.   With the focus just on the women of the US work force an increase of remote work would allow for more women to keep themselves and their children out of poverty just from the view point of caregiving and childcare restrictions physically and financially on women and families. It would also create more opportunities for educated women to shine in the workplace.  

Remote work as infrastructure cannot be understated.  Yes, working and caring for others is HARD work!  However, one thing Covid-19 taught America is we are not afraid of a little hard work and when given the opportunity to work remote life and work continued.